OpenCode vs Claude Code: open-source freedom or Anthropic's own agent?
OpenCode is a free, MIT-licensed coding agent that works with models from many providers; Claude Code is Anthropic's own agent, built for Claude models and included in paid Claude plans from USD 20 a month. Choose OpenCode if you want to pick or swap models and read the source. Choose Claude Code if you want one vendor's tool, checkpoints and the deepest Claude integration. Both read AGENTS.md.
What is the main difference between OpenCode and Claude Code?
The difference is who controls the model. Claude Code is made by Anthropic to run Anthropic's Claude models, and the tool and the model are sold together. OpenCode is a separate open-source project, made by Anomaly, that is not tied to one model vendor: you connect the provider you want, including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and local runtimes, or use models OpenCode itself offers. Everything else, the terminal interface, file editing, command running and planning, is similar in kind. This page uses each project's own documentation and pricing pages as of October 30, 2026. It omits speed and benchmark claims because they depend on which model you plug in.
| OpenCode | Claude Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Made by | Anomaly (open-source project, anomalyco/opencode) | Anthropic |
| License | MIT | Repository declares no open-source license |
| Price of the tool | Free to use | Included in paid Claude plans from USD 20 a month billed monthly (Pro), or billed by API tokens |
| Models | 75 or more providers through Models.dev, local models, plus OpenCode Zen and Go | Claude models, through Anthropic or a cloud provider |
| Where it runs | Terminal, desktop app, web, IDE extension, GitHub | Terminal, VS Code, JetBrains, desktop app, web, mobile |
| Instruction file | AGENTS.md; falls back to CLAUDE.md | CLAUDE.md; reads AGENTS.md when no CLAUDE.md exists |
How do OpenCode and Claude Code compare in detail?
The entries give each tool's documented facts. The order is not a ranking.
01 Claude Code
Anthropic's agentic coding tool for the terminal, editors, a desktop app and the web, running Claude models.
- Models
- Claude. You sign in with a Claude subscription or a Console account; enterprises can use Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud's Agent Platform or Microsoft Foundry.
- Cost
- Pro USD 20 a month billed monthly (USD 17 on annual billing), Max USD 100, Ultra USD 200, as of October 2026. Not in the Free plan. Usage limits apply every five hours and each week.
- Safety
- Permission modes from asking before most actions to an auto mode with a classifier, an optional OS-level sandbox for shell commands, and checkpoints with /rewind.
- Extend
- Hooks, skills, subagents, MCP, plugins, GitHub Actions, Code Review and an Agent SDK.
Claude Code's argument is depth with one vendor. Features such as checkpoint rewind, the permission modes and the Claude-specific skills and hooks are built around Claude models. The trade is lock-in to that model family and a plan with usage caps. See the Claude Code tutorial and the honest review.
02 OpenCode
An open-source AI coding agent for the terminal, desktop and IDE that works with models from many providers.
- Models
- Connect any provider with the /connect command and an API key, including Anthropic, OpenAI and local models. OpenCode lists 75 or more providers through Models.dev and includes some free models.
- Cost
- OpenCode is free. You pay your model provider, or use OpenCode Zen (pay per request, with an initial USD 20 balance) or Go (USD 10 a month, USD 40 on Go Plus) for curated models.
- Safety
- Per-tool permissions set to allow, ask or deny, with pattern rules; a Plan agent that denies edits; an optional --auto flag; /undo and /redo for changes.
- Extend
- Custom agents and subagents, commands, skills, MCP servers, LSP servers, formatters, plugins, an SDK and a server mode.
OpenCode's argument is choice. You can use a cheaper model for routine edits, a stronger one for planning, or a local model for private code. You can also read and change the tool, which is MIT-licensed on GitHub. The trade is that quality now depends on the model you chose, and you manage keys and costs per provider. OpenCode documents two versions, OpenCode 1 and OpenCode 2, that both use the opencode command and cannot be installed side by side under their default command. Read the install note on its intro page before you install.
Which one costs less?
OpenCode costs nothing as software. What you pay is the model. Claude Code bundles the model into a subscription, so the question becomes how you want to pay.
| Route | What you pay | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code on Claude Pro | USD 20 a month billed monthly (USD 17 on annual billing) | Usage limits every 5 hours and each week; Claude Code not in the Free plan |
| Claude Code on Max or Ultra | USD 100 or USD 200 a month | 5x Pro usage, or 10x Pro weekly usage on Ultra |
| OpenCode with free models | USD 0 | OpenCode says it comes with a set of free models usable without an account, and its FAQ says data is stored only when you use those free models |
| OpenCode with Go | USD 10 a month, or USD 40 on Go Plus | Curated open coding models with estimated request limits per 5 hours and per month; Go Teams is USD 20 per member |
| OpenCode with Zen | Pay as you go, starting with a USD 20 balance | Zen says it charges per request with zero markups and lets you set monthly spend limits |
| OpenCode with your own API key | Provider's token prices | Anthropic, OpenAI, Google and others; local models are free to run on your hardware |
Two cautions. First, Anthropic's own cost documentation says that across enterprise deployments the average cost of Claude Code is around USD 13 per developer per active day and USD 150 to 250 per developer per month when billed by API tokens. If you attach a Claude API key to OpenCode you are on the same kind of per-token billing, which can exceed a USD 20 subscription for heavy use. Second, a cheaper model is only cheaper if it finishes the job in a similar number of attempts. A tool that needs three tries at half the price is not a saving.
How do the features compare?
| Feature | OpenCode | Claude Code |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal interface | Yes (TUI) | Yes |
| Desktop app and web | Yes | Yes |
| IDE integration | Extension for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf and forks; share your selection or tab | VS Code and JetBrains extensions |
| Plan before editing | Plan agent, switched with the Tab key; denies file edits except plan files | Plan mode |
| Undo changes | /undo and /redo | Checkpoints and /rewind |
| Subagents | Built-in General and Explore subagents; custom agents | Yes |
| Skills | SKILL.md files; also loads Claude-compatible .claude/skills folders | Yes |
| MCP servers | Yes | Yes |
| Permissions | allow, ask or deny per tool, with pattern rules where the last match wins | Permission modes plus allow, ask and deny rules |
| Run in GitHub | Mention /opencode or /oc in an issue or pull request; runs in your Actions runner | GitHub Actions and, on Team and Enterprise plans, Code Review |
| Library for your own agents | SDK and server | Agent SDK for Python and TypeScript |
| Choose any model provider | Yes | No; Claude models only |
The pattern repeats from other comparisons. The core loop is the same, and the product differences sit in the edges: who supplies the model, how undo works, and which integrations are first-party. For the same exercise against OpenAI's agent, see Claude Code vs Codex.
Which is safer to let loose on a project?
Neither is safe by default if you switch off every prompt. Both let an agent run shell commands, and both let you restrict that.
- OpenCode resolves each permission to allow, ask or deny. Rules are matched by pattern and the last matching rule wins, so you put the catch-all first and exceptions after it. Its --auto flag approves anything not explicitly denied, and explicit deny rules still apply. Its Plan agent refuses edits by default, which is a cheap way to review an approach.
- Claude Code has named permission modes, from asking before most actions to a classifier-reviewed auto mode, and a stricter mode for locked-down scripts. It adds an optional OS-level sandbox for shell commands (macOS, Linux, WSL2; off by default) and automatic checkpoints you can rewind.
In both tools, commit your work before a long run, keep secrets out of the folder, and read the diff. OpenCode's homepage says it does not store your code or context data, and that data is stored only when you use its free models. Treat that as the vendor's statement and read its privacy page before you use private code. The same caution applies to any vendor.
What carries over if you switch between them?
More than you might expect, because both read the shared AGENTS.md format.
| Item | Carries over? | How |
|---|---|---|
| AGENTS.md | Yes | OpenCode reads it natively. Claude Code reads it when there is no CLAUDE.md, or import it with @AGENTS.md from a CLAUDE.md |
| CLAUDE.md | Partly | OpenCode uses CLAUDE.md only if the project has no AGENTS.md. Its global ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md is also a fallback |
| Skills | Yes | OpenCode searches .claude/skills in the project and home directory, as well as its own folders |
| MCP servers, hooks, permissions | No | Each tool keeps these in its own settings files and format; set them up again |
| Session history and checkpoints | No | They stay with each tool |
Per the OpenCode rules page, you can disable the Claude compatibility fallbacks with environment variables such as OPENCODE_DISABLE_CLAUDE_CODE=1. That is useful if you want OpenCode to ignore your Claude files entirely.
A sensible setup for trying both is one AGENTS.md with your commands and rules, a CLAUDE.md that imports it, and nothing tool-specific in the shared file.
Which should you choose?
| If you... | Choose | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Want to choose, mix or swap models, or use local ones | OpenCode | Model choice is the core design; Claude Code runs Claude only |
| Want to read or modify the source of your agent | OpenCode | MIT-licensed on GitHub |
| Want the lowest possible starting cost | OpenCode | The tool is free, and it includes free models; check data terms for those |
| Want one vendor, one bill and a predictable monthly price | Claude Code | A Pro plan at USD 20 a month bundles the model and the tool |
| Want automatic checkpoints and rewind | Claude Code | Documented built-in feature; OpenCode offers /undo and /redo |
| Work at a company standardized on Anthropic, AWS, Google Cloud or Azure for Claude | Claude Code | Documented enterprise routes and admin controls |
| Are a beginner who wants the least to configure | Claude Code | One sign-in and one model; OpenCode needs a provider and a model choice first |
| Are curious | Try both | Both are cheap to try and read the same AGENTS.md |
If you want to pit them against each other, give both the same small task from the developer tools category on the board. Every idea has a generated build prompt you can paste in. Use identical settings, then compare tests passing, corrections needed and cost. If you need other options, the Claude Code alternatives page lists more.
How do you try OpenCode in five minutes?
These steps follow OpenCode's intro page. Check it first, since the install command depends on which version you want.
- Install: run curl -fsSL https://opencode.ai/install | bash, or npm install -g opencode-ai, or brew install anomalyco/tap/opencode for OpenCode 1. On Windows the docs recommend WSL.
- Connect a model: start opencode, type /connect and choose a provider, for example Anthropic with an API key from the Console, or OpenCode Zen.
- Open your project folder and run opencode.
- Type /init so it scans the project and writes an AGENTS.md. Commit that file.
- Press Tab to switch to the Plan agent, describe a change, and read the plan before switching back to Build.
- If a change is wrong, type /undo.
Read AGENTS.md, then give me a plan to add [feature] to this project. List the files you would change and the tests you would add. Do not edit anything yet. After I approve the plan, implement it, run the tests, and tell me what changed.
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenCode better than Claude Code?
Neither wins everywhere. OpenCode is free, MIT-licensed and works with many model providers, so it suits people who want choice. Claude Code is Anthropic's own agent with checkpoints, permission modes and tight Claude integration, sold through paid plans. Quality in OpenCode depends heavily on the model you connect, so test with your own task.
Is OpenCode free?
The tool itself is free and MIT-licensed. It also ships with a set of free models you can use without an account. Beyond that you pay your model provider, or you can use OpenCode Zen (pay as you go) or the Go subscription, which starts at USD 10 a month as of October 2026. Check the privacy notes on the free models.
Can OpenCode use Claude models?
Yes, through an Anthropic API key from the Console, connected with the /connect command. OpenCode's own documentation says using a Claude Pro or Max subscription through plugins is prohibited by Anthropic and that it removed such plugins in version 1.3.0. Expect per-token API billing rather than a flat subscription.
Can OpenCode read my CLAUDE.md?
Yes, as a fallback. OpenCode looks for AGENTS.md first and uses CLAUDE.md only when the project has no AGENTS.md. It also falls back to ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md and loads skills from .claude/skills. You can switch all of this off with the OPENCODE_DISABLE_CLAUDE_CODE environment variable.
Which is better for a beginner?
Claude Code is simpler to start with: one sign-in, one model and one plan price. OpenCode asks you to connect a provider and choose a model first, which gives more control and more to learn. A beginner who wants no code to read at all may prefer a browser app builder to either tool.
Can I use both on the same project?
Yes. Both read AGENTS.md, so keep your shared commands and rules there, and let a CLAUDE.md import it with @AGENTS.md. Hooks, MCP settings and permissions live in each tool's own files. Use separate git branches if you run them on the same task so their edits do not collide.
Post your build ideas publishes this comparison and lists itself first. Facts about other products were checked on their own websites on the date shown above; prices and features change, so confirm on their sites before you decide. About the publisher.